Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Decision making is a very difficult task for me, whether it is in my personal or professional life. Some people take their decisions by taking their own time, while others take immediately. I believe that, most of the time, decisions made in hurry are poor decisions. There is a chance of mistakes and it could also create problems, and therefore, I think people should take their decisions after careful thought.
To begin with my first reason for this opinion is decisions made in hurry increases our chances of making mistakes and creates problems. From my own experience, if I have to cook something in hurry, then I always forget to add something in my recipe and that make my recipe taste less. Second, while working out, if I try to exercise in hurry, then I might have to face some physical injury or pain. So, I believe that, everyone should take their decisions by thinking and taking some time, which can save them from problems.
Second, most of the time, decisions made in hurry consider as poor decisions. Many times people could not make right decision in hurry. For example, while playing, if players know that opposite team is doing good, and with this pressure player takes poor decision and loose the match. Second example, while working in office with pressure and time limitations, employees take wrong decisions in hurry, this can have bad effect on their overall performance. So, at such situations, we should be quick, but not in hurry, that helps us to take good decision. Hence, thinking before taking any decisions allow us to take wise decision.
Finally, many times we have to take decisions on the spot. In such situations, we should be sharp, and quick in our thoughts, but not in hurry. Because, decisions made in hurry could be poor; could make mistakes, and create problems. So, it is always better to give a thought before taking any decisions.
MÌNH ĐÃ LÀM BÀI NAY TRONG PHẦN THI IELTS CỦA TRUNG TÂM BẠN XEM THAM KHẢO!
Agree with the following statement that parents are the best teachers for children because they try to learn everything from their parents that help them in their future and also helpful in making their personality. Parents seem to be mirror image of their children , who want to be exactly like that image in their lives.
Behaviour is naturally adapted by the young ones by seeing their surrounding ,the kind of behaviour in which they live at their homes and it depends mostly on parents to teach their child to behave properly or improperly such as if parents are unable to keep their house environment disciplined than this environment will be noted by kids and they will learn the same behaviour which lacks some discipline,respect for their entire life.
Parents will have the responsibility to make their children learn responsibility in life , their goals for life,healthy and prosperous way of living,their behaviour with other people,peaceful environment must be present in life. Such things are taught by parents that help us in making our living good and well managed.
Therefore,the role of parents are indefinite and significant in everybody's lives and they are the milestone who give us way to lead our lives with a respectful manner.Parents are the best guide for children's life and they give their children advice and support in any circumstances present in their lives .
Even though these children become adults and are able to understand every situation,make their own decisions.Parents will always with their kids and always guide them like they did before .
CÔ MÌNH CÓ CHO CHÉP MỘT BÀI MẪU ĐỂ THAM KHẢO, BẠN ĐỌC QUA XEM THỬ CÓ HAY KHÔNG? (DISAGREE)
Parents teach a lot to the children and the ground made by them shapes the future of the children. On the other hand, someone learns throughout his life and thus become the person he really is. In this learning process, he himself contributes the most and teachers, friends, nature, books, academic education are important as well. Though parents are very good teachers, in my opinion, they are not the best teacher for someone and the person himself is the best teacher for him.
After we learn to talk, walk and basic morality and intricacies of our life, we start going to school and there we learn new things every day. The book, the teachers, the friends and the environment shapes what we become. Parents teach their kid to a bright, good fellow and yet there are lots of immoral and corrupted people who actually were transformed badly by themselves. So someone himself is the best teacher for him. Besides this the things we learn from our life experiences, teachers and books become far more important that what we learned in our infant time.
Parents do their fine duty to raise a child to become a good adult and later he gets the education and experiences from his life and school play the vital role for his future.
In terms of being our teachers, our experience and nature play an utmost important role. We learn so many things from our surroundings and nature is a silent teacher who widely opens the mystery and significance of our life.
The things we learn from our parents are of course important to our life but they are rather some righteous lessons and good advises. Later in our life, we face the real situations and learn the true lessons from our experience and in terms of learning this is the most important part.
So considering all of the above, I would like to opine that, parents are very important teachers for us but never the best teachers.
BÀI TRƯỚC LÀ ĐỒNG Ý; BÀI NÀY LÀ KHÔNG ĐỒNG Ý. AND YOU?
In the modern days, the accomodation affects us very much so choosing a properly place to live is an important thing to do.
Everyone will consider living in the city or in the countryside but if we take a closer look , we will see the advantages and disadvantages of each. For examples, the city may convenient but the countryside is more green and beautiful than the city. If the children who live in city, they may be successful but their health is not. Otherwise, the children who live in the countryside may not approach to high techonology and modern studying methods but their minds aren't under pressure of studying too much. In short, every place has each advantages and disadvantages but I think living in the city will be good for children
Television has many useful and educational programs that can help children learn useful things, some knowledge about nature from the programs on television. However, watching TV regularly is not necessarily good for children. So I disagree about letting children watch TV regularly at school and at home.
Watching television regularly will make children have eye problems, addiction to television and will have health consequences such as obesity and asthma. Not only does TV not only have educational programs but it also has many programs that teach children about bad habits, causing many children to engage in aggressive, violent or irritable behaviors. In addition, it can also reduce creativity and imagination, become ineffective at work, and watch a lot of TV will decrease academic performance. Affects perception of the world around them. Lack of social language skills, limited interaction with others and other essential social skills.
So avoid letting children watch TV a lot, as it can greatly affect future generations . We need to encourage children to participate in outdoor activities to exercise their health. 
I do not agree on computer learning. Although learning on computers, although helping learners to be more flexible in the fields of technology and creativity, there are still many negative aspects, not meeting the learning needs of students:
First, the quality of learning via the Internet cannot be compared with the traditional way of learning - which creates better interaction between students and teachers, managed, questioned, evaluated.
Second, online training can cause social isolation, because school is not only a place to learn but also a place where they come to socialize, make new friends and learn more communication experiences.
Third, this form creates an unevenness among localities. For children who have full learning equipment, have a sense of self-study and good family management, it works. Those children with difficult and unmanaged conditions will learn to cope.
While the benefits of learning online are obvious, it's important to remember that not all courses can be taught online. Therefore, online training should be seen as a complementary and extensible approach to classical forms of learning.
I half agree with this opinion. Why?
Schools have considered the second house where the children can study, play and join the extracurricular activities. In the school, the student can learn all the subject to expand their knowledge, do the exams... and specially, they can play with their friends. But sometime, study too much make they feel stress, yeah, I know this
Study on Internet has some advantages: they can learn by the photos, stories, songs... and they can stop when they want. But, it has many disadvantage. The children are too young to choose the information on Internet, which need to know or needn't. The Internet has many temptation like: games, cartoons... make they can't forcus on study if their parents won't monitoring them, use to much or to long time the electronic device can make their eyes have many problems.
With many reasons, the Internet just help 40 percents the children on study. I think schools have many advantage than study on Internet