Some people think that too much attention and too many resources have been
given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree
or disagree?
K
Khách
Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Những câu hỏi liên quan
LY
27 tháng 2 2017
Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.
While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.
When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.
In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.
LY
27 tháng 2 2017
All around the world, tourism is losing its glitter, due to the lack of responsibility by the government, tourists and local people. Some people consider taking responsibility in tourism by each individual is essential for the better environment, preserving cultures and improving the economy, whereas others think, this cannot be achieved in reality. In my opinion, tourism responsibility is required for better future of the world and this can be achieved with proper implementation.
People travel to different places but never show any attention or responsibility towards its improvement. To make this world a better place to live in, one should take it as one’s responsibility. First of all, the government should take a step, releasing more funds towards tourism and for providing much security. For instance, we find filthy guest houses, restrooms and no cleaning of surrounding places. People travel to enjoy the beauty of nature, but if they find this kind of dirty places, their enjoyment which lead to a bad memory. Even, local people and tourists who travel should obey the guidelines and policy of tourism for a better world.
However, there are some people who think when it comes to implementation of this; it is like a day dream which cannot come into reality. It is difficult for poor and developing countries to utilise more funds towards tourism. On the other hand, it is difficult to provide security and neatness at tourist spots unless every tourist shows attention as his responsibility. For instance, if there are sign boards which shows ‘please use right direction, danger at left direction’, they use only left and if there are any dustbins with ‘please use me’ , they do not use them at all. Thus it is very difficult to make it into reality.
In conclusion, better tourism can be achieved only if every individual takes the responsibility towards tourism. One should think, how much one is contributing, instead of just arguing and blaming the government. But the government should take the first step in achieving this. With this, not only it increases blissfulness of tourists but also increases economy of the country.
VT
26 tháng 2 2017
Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.
While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.
When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.
In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.
26 tháng 2 2017
Bạn có thể tham khảo bài này ở trang IELTS Mentor nha!
H
1 tháng 1 2020
There is a common belief that in a family, men’s role is to work and women take a responsibility for home. While I agree with that notion, I also believe that today, the task of both genders are equal on the society and at home
At the outset, it will better for families if the task of earning money is for males and females take care of the family. It is true that maternal instincts is necessary for children. What mothers do is likely to more careful than that of fathers in terms of housework. Therefore, a house which is taken care by mothers would be cozy and happy that contributes to a sustainable society for a nation. A typical example is in Japan, a high proportion of women would stop their career path for spending more time on home. Moreover, these days, the pressure of work has been significantly increasing day by day. Females tend to be more negatively affected than males in life. As a result, more and more divorces have occurred which the primary reason is that women cannot obtain a balance between work and family.
Despite those above arguments, nowadays, gender role is equality which both men and women have the same responsibility for family. Children need to be educated and nurtured from fathers and mothers for full development. Without father’s attention, children might not learn strong characters. In term of financial issues, If men only make money for whole family, not only males will be under heavily burden of monetary but also the family tend to deal with the risk of finance in case of unemployment. Additionally, the awareness of people in gender issues has been raisen in societies recently. Hence, women have rights to have a job outside for broadening their mind and helping family.In conclusion, although I argue that men’s role is to go to work and women’s main mission is to take care of family, I am of the opinion that females should obtain a job in a company.
GK
17 tháng 6 2021
For a long time, television has been regarded as a saving means of entertainment and acquiring useful knowledge. However, besides the benefits mentioned above, it also brings a lot of harm because of the following reasons. First, watching TV takes up a lot of our time. I do not deny the benefits such as entertainment or education that it brings. However, instead of spending all the day just watching TV, we can do some useful works such as doing homework, helping mother to do housework. Through that, we can gather for ourselves a lot of soft skills and become closer to the other. Second, sitting too close to the TV screen will make harm affect on our health. Studies have shown that sitting near television will shorten our vision, in addition increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases and degeneration of the neck vertebrae ... These are the disadvantages that no one expects. Therefore, let's limit the amount of time spending watching TV and save that time doing other useful things.
NH
17 tháng 6 2021
In recent years, due to the strong development of new advanced technologies, children in big cities have a great opportunity to be exposed to it from an early age. So most people assume that there are broad and serious aspects not only to education, but also to children's development. In my opinion, TV has an impact on both
On the one hand, I agree that watching too much is harmful to children's education and psychological development. Firstly, compared to other activities, children spend too much time on TV, leading to lack of learning. As a result, their learning can be reduced, or worse, they can be expelled from school. Second, greater involvement in inappropriate planning is associated with a number of negative effects on psychological development such as violence, depression, and autism. In addition, sitting in front of the TV for a long time can cause many dangerous diseases, such as obesity or myopia. This brings not only an economic burden to their families, but also an economic burden to society.
On the other hand, there is some undeniable evidence demonstrating the widespread benefits of television. I think so because the amount of knowledge in the 21st century comes not only from school or home, but also from digital devices like television or the Internet. For example, children can use documentaries or reality TV shows to identify different soft skills, such as problem-solving, communication, or survival skills. In addition, according to some scientific reports on TV, children can expand their knowledge to develop physically and mentally, for example, "remember to drink at least 2 liters of water a day to promote metabolism. metabolism” or “be careful when going out at night. Because it is possible to encounter some evil activities of society " Collectively, it has been proven that regular parental guidance is very beneficial for children to watch TV to gain more useful knowledge. for yourself.
KY
13 tháng 7 2019
Some people believe that printed newspapers are becoming worthless in the contemporary life. While there are a variety of ground supporting this view, I would argue that printed newspapers continue to play an essential role in life.
Continuous advancement in technology provides people with more convenient options for gathering news which are alternatives for printed newspapers. First, an enormous number of articles or reports nowadays could be assessed merely via smartphones or computer with the internet connection, and not only does the news contain a broad spectrum of contents but it can also be updated by the minute. It is obviously more convenient than the traditional measure of reading news, for example, on daily newspapers with limited content in few pages. Second, the spread of alternative options namely the radio or the internet which reach almost every corner of the world has reduced the dependence on printed newspapers as a main source of information.
Despite such advantages of the news conveys by other faster means, I consider that there is still a continuing need for printed newspapers today. One reason is that reading a newspaper is a daily habit which many people, especially the elderly, still enjoy. They are really interested in the leisurely routine of reading newspapers over breakfast or drinking cups of coffee. Another consideration is people can share the newspapers with others since printed newspapers can simply be picked up or put down at a will. For example, I often read a newspaper on the train or bus and then leave the paper on the seat for other passengers if they wish.
In conclusion, albeit the increasing availability of other high-speed sources of news, newspapers still contribute a certain value to human life today.
KQ
4 tháng 5 2019
I don't think that talent, wealth and attraction cannot bring happiness to people because they have these things but they don't have love, they don't care about others, how can they be called happiness? I think happy people will always think about others, think positively, always work hard, appreciate the smallest and most important things they know to give away without getting back.
QN
31 tháng 5 2018
Sample Answer :
In many countries, especially in developing countries, foreign movies are more popular than the locally made films. There are several reasons for this trend and the government can and should greatly contribute to promoting domestic movies for the overall progress of the industry.
The main reason people prefer movies from other countries is the quality of the movie. It is often noticed that locally made films in many countries lack better plots and the characters do not have the necessary depth to touch the hearts of the audiences. Moreover, foreign films have a great variation and they are more enjoyable than the domestic films. This happens because large film industries like the Hollywood can allocate a huge budget and have talented producers and directors while films made in developing countries have a small amount to spend on a movie and do not have many talented movie makers. For instance, the type of animated movies and special effects developing countries produce these days are unimaginable in most of the developing countries and this is why movie lovers from these countries prefer to watch movies made in other countries. The poor quality of acting and low-budget filmmaking in most of the developing countries discourage the audiences to enjoy local films.
In my opinion, the government should support the film industry in order to support this industry, encourage people to enjoy more domestically produced films and gain international acclimation for quality movies. Each country has some talented producers, actors and filmmakers who for the lack of financial and political support cannot bring out the best. They should be given a chance to prove themselves. No doubt big budget is required to make better quality films and the government should provide subsidiary to help local film industry progress. Government’s help for the movie industry would bring more audiences to the theatre to enjoy those films and earn more ticket money. Moreover, quality films would compete in international stages and bring fame for the country.
In conclusion, the film industry in each country should be supported by the government as it would make local films popular and earn money and fame for the country.
#Nhi ☺
For centuries, deforestation, farming, urbanisation and other human activities have wreaked havoc with wild animal species and sent them to the verge of extinction. Regarding wildlife protection, awareness has been raised and attempts have been made. However, some hold the idea that the protection of endangered species has been given inordinate amount of attention and resources. Personally, I do not see eye to eye with this point of view.In the first place, wildlife protection has never taken centre stage on the media.Compared with celebrities, for example, the amount of coverage of wild animals isinfinitesimal. Clearly, the reason is profits. In other words, programs featuring wildanimals do not generate interest of the public and accordingly returns for theproducers. The absence of educational programs concerning the lives of wild animalshas blinded people to the reality that wild animals are dying and the ecological systemare being disrupted severely. In addition, governments around the world do not prioritise wildlife conservation in their agenda’s. As a matter of fact, laws to save wild animals have been introduced, but they are loosely enforced. Because of this, every man can freely exploit land, chop down forests, and divert the water sources, all of which combine to destroy the natural habitats of threatened animals. In every corners of the world, with or without intention, human are still causing changes in climatic and geopgraphical conditions, which accelerates of animal extinction. In light of this fact, I feel that not enough attention and resources are being given in the conservation of wild flora and fauna and stronger actions need to be taken to save them.
Music is a great way to bring people of different cultures and ages together” -I totally agree with this point. I think EDM (Electronic Dance Music) is the best music that I've heard. people create. Music plays an important role in our modern world. It can eliminate cultural and generational differences. Music has the ability to broaden people's horizons and welcome different cultures from all over the world. Needless to say, each country has its own traditions to enforce their culture and norms. Music can bridge this cultural gap and is a great way to help individuals collaborate better with others. For example, music parties like Tomorrowland are held all over the world, giving citizens from all over the world the opportunity to get in touch with the national culture and gain a deeper understanding of it. Overall, we cannot deny the importance of music in our lives and its ability to connect people from different cultural backgrounds and ages.