Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Một số người tin rằng công nghệ ảnh hưởng xấu đến cuộc sống của chúng ta và các khía cạnh thao túng của nó sẽ kiểm soát lối sống của chúng ta. Tuy nhiên, những người khác lại cho rằng công nghệ mang lại nhiều lợi ích cho loài người. Bài luận này thảo luận về cả hai quan điểm. Tuy nhiên, tôi nghĩ rằng công nghệ sẽ có lợi miễn là chúng ta kiểm soát nó, và không để nó kiểm soát chúng ta.
Đầu tiên, công nghệ đã định hình đáng kể cách sống của con người và nó không ngừng làm cho cuộc sống của chúng ta trở nên dễ dàng hơn. Thông thường, các nhà phát triển công nghệ công bố các tiện ích công nghệ sáng tạo dễ sử dụng, tiện dụng, sáng tạo và tiết kiệm. Những thiết bị này cải thiện đáng kể cuộc sống của con người và chúng ta có một lối sống tốt hơn ngày nay so với quá khứ do những cải tiến và đổi mới trong công nghệ. Ví dụ, điện thoại di động đã được cải thiện đáng kể về hiệu suất và tính hữu dụng. Ngày nay, chúng đang được sử dụng trong mọi khía cạnh của cuộc sống bao gồm thanh toán hóa đơn, liên lạc, ghi chú, lướt mạng và cho nhiều mục đích thiết thực khác. Thế giới hiện đại thực sự được xác định bởi các công nghệ hiện đại.
Mặt khác, công nghệ không đến mà không có hậu quả tiêu cực. Nó đã bắt đầu kiểm soát nhiều khía cạnh cuộc sống hàng ngày của chúng ta và có thể trở nên thảm khốc hơn bất kỳ ai có thể tưởng tượng nếu nó vượt ra khỏi tầm kiểm soát. Ví dụ: mọi người đang sử dụng thiết bị di động ngày nay, vì vậy họ lưu trữ ảnh cá nhân, chi tiết liên hệ và thậm chí cả tệp trên điện thoại của họ. Vì vậy, rất dễ dàng để tin tặc xâm nhập vào điện thoại của ai đó và sử dụng chúng một cách sai trái. Do đó, gian lận giao dịch trực tuyến, vi rút và trojan độc hại, nguy hiểm cho sức khỏe, thiếu liên kết cá nhân và xã hội là do chúng ta nghiêng về công nghệ. Chúng tôi có nghĩa là kiểm soát công nghệ, không bị kiểm soát bởi nó.
Tóm lại, dù công nghệ có những nhược điểm nhưng không thể phủ nhận rằng không phải mọi thứ mà con người tạo ra đều hoàn mỹ. Hơn nữa, công nghệ có thể rất hữu ích nếu nó được sử dụng đúng cách và đủ thận trọng. Vì vậy, chúng ta nên kiểm soát công nghệ, đừng để nó kiểm soát chúng ta...
1. You have a great influence on the young generation: As a teacher you have the opportunity to communicate and educate hundreds of young people. You are the one who directly molds children from early toddler days. So ask anyone who is the most influential person for a child? And the chances you hear the most are the teachers.
2. You are an actor, a rhetorician, a storyteller and a professional organizer: As a teacher you will have to take on all the above and even more. You will have the opportunity to face many challenges. You have to inspire, guide and entertain the children through the activities and experiences that they have experienced. In a day on the podium you have to show the ability to organize, plan, train and play.
3. Teaching is a very meaningful job: If you are looking for a job that brings joy, sublimation to you, the profession will give you all that feeling. Do not just teach things in books, direct them to do the right thing ... As a teacher, you also get help and education for young people in society as well as when you train a person Labor for the future.
4. Always cultivate, learn: "Study, learn, study forever" is the motto of those who love teaching. Knowledge is endless and therefore teachers, who need to cultivate, train and learn new things, new teaching methods through books or classes for teaching staff to not fall Back to the education of countries around the world. So they have the capacity to support future generations of the country.
Everyone respects and loves the teacher: If you are a teacher, you can be proud and proud to talk about your career. Teachers are beloved, respected for many reasons and perhaps the reason they are most admired is the patience, the ability to control and communicate to dozens of people. And for all the reasons we had on November 20th (Teacher's Day Vietnam) to express our gratitude as well as the merit of our teachers.
There is no doubt that education is a top priority. However, these days the number of people having no wish to become teachers is increasing very strongly. This particularly worrying situation is taking place all over the world. Therefore, the authorities are doing their best to find out the reasons and a practical solution.
To start with, a wide variety of students do not pursue a career as teachers for the simple reason that the salary just helps them make ends meet. For example, my old classmate, Tom has to earn his bread hard to support his family.Today, everything is always increasing in price so it is essential for them to have stable jobs. Also, we are facing to the alarmingly high rate of unemployment. So plenty of graduate students are at all unsure about their jobs especially teachers.
Besides that, a lot of people are fed up with becoming teachers by reason of students' disrespect to their teachers. That students have bad behaviors towards their teachers is getting more and more popular. Despite the fact that they break the school rules and feel too lazy to study, they are not punished appropriately. In contrast to devoted teachers, a large number of teachers don't assume overall responsibility for their work. This makes their students misunderstand the importance of education.Ngoài ra còn những lí do gì nữa? Bạn có thể phân tích nhé.
In order to appeal more students to become teachers, we need to make attempts to find solutions. For instance, Ho Chi Minh City has brought in effective solutions like raising teachers'salary, providing dormitories in good conditions for teachers and decreasing working hours. Especially, Ministry of Education and Training had better abrogate the serious problem that teachers and students only care about achievements in lieu of the true result. It's high time they reformed the whole teachers.
To conclude, the shortcomings, although on the rise, can be purged at the grass-root level if proper preventive measures are taken. We really want major breakthroughs in education and training. It's for everyone and we ought to take action immediately.
Sample Answer 1:
Road safety has become a great concern for people with the rise of accidents and fatality those accidents cause every day. People have a varying opinion on how to make roads safe and I believe strict laws should be there to punish the driving offenders but a combination of other methods would bring better results.
On the one hand, people seem to abide by a law or rule when they know that violation would bring severe retribution. For instance, in some Asian countries pedestrians used to cross the roads and when a more rigid penalty has been imposed, those very people started using the underpass. From this perspective, strict penalty and fine can certainly improve the road safety as people would be more cautious and afraid of the consequence of the violation of the traffic laws. As an outcome, it is a fact that, the sterner the punishment, the greater chances that people would follow the rules.
On the other hand, there are already severe punishments for driving offenders including ceasing the driving license, monetary fines and imprisonments. Despite this, the number of road accidents is increasing every year. This is why I believe that only punishment cannot ensure the road security and safety. A combination of other initiatives is also required. First, we need to aware people about the devastating consequences traffic rule violations can bring to our life. Second, the requirements for passing the driving test should be standardised and made more practical, especially in developing countries where people can use advantages of the corruption. It is often noticed that many young people are given driving license without scrutinising their experience and skills. This should be completely avoided and after a certain period, each driver should be retested. Third, unfit vehicles should not be allowed to run on the roads as these cars cause more accidents according to the recent Road Transport Authority report. Finally, the traffic system of a country should be modernised and more surveillance cameras and speed test cameras should be there.
To conclude, punishment to traffic rule violators is a good way to make the road safer but the combination of other steps would bring more desired results.
Model Answer 2:
At recent years, there is an ongoing debate whether giving dire punishment to driving offences are the best solution to overcome severe accidents in roads or not. While some support this idea, many others believe that governments should provide improvements in road safety. This essay will try to discuss both views with several considerations given underneath.
People are not prompted to engage safety driving because there are no regulations relating to drivers to be more careful on the road. It can be found in developing countries where the traffic is not well arranged and as a result, the numbers of terrible accidents remain dominant. Dissimilar with it, developed countries pay more attentions in this case by restricting the use of vehicles without licence limiting the top speed in certain busy areas such as boulevards and main roads, and imposing fine for all the offence forms in high rate, and as a result, these countries can overcome traffic accidents.
However, governments with all efforts must improve the infrastructure of safety riding. Traffic signs should be renewed, the facilities in the road are supposed to be changed, etc. so the drivers can recognise the driving surroundings vividly. Furthermore, technologies are also urgent to deal with daunting events in driving environment. It is good news that outrageously inventions have been created and applied but still attempts in technology findings are required.
In conclusion, while there are regulations to be defined, governments together with scientists, engineers, and car businessmen have to maximise in providing safety riding facilities to gain maximum result on this issue.
[ Written by - Angga Cool ]
Model Answer 3:
A group of people believe that in order to increase the safety for the driving on roads, governments should make stricter regulations for any indiscipline in driving attitudes. On the contrary, another group thinks that authorities should consider other effective solutions for it. The following essay will discuss both views in details, but in my personal opinion, I do believe that the combination of both ideas would ensure a better road safety.
On the one hand, many people worry about the number of driving accidents. Each year, the number of people who are injured or pass away due to traffic accidents has increased significantly. In most cases, accidents have occurred due to the interdisciplinary acts of the drivers themselves, such as speeding, drunk driving or using their mobile phones during driving. And to solve the problem, the government should make a strict regulation about traffic accidents. People who are found to be guilty of any driving rule violation should be punished with serious penalties and detentions. By having these kinds of policy, it is hoped that traffic accident rates will decrease gradually.
On the other hand, other people believe that strict punishments would not effectively solve the problem. There are other measures which governments and the public should consider. Firstly, governments could cooperate with the media in making campaign about safe driving. Television commercials and magazine advertisements could be used by the government in socialising about the negative effect of aggressive or offensive driving. Secondly, governments could also give rewards to their citizens who are obeying the road regulations. For example, when people renew their driving license, authorities could check their track records. Those who have clean track records could get motor vehicles tax discount or exemption.
In conclusion, people have a varying opinion on how to reduce the number traffic accidents. While some people believe that there should be stricter policies and regulations about driving, others think that there should be another effective way of addressing the issue. In my point of view, I believe that both policies have their own positive sides and when people could combine them, it would be an effective way of reducing traffic accidents.
[ Written by - Darwin Lesmana ]
Model Answer 4:
Nowadays, the accidents that occur on the road are likely to rise in number in some countries. While an army of people think that these issues can be tackled by penalising offenders strictly, others think that there are other steps that can be taken to cope with it.
It is clear that the strict punishments set up for the driving offences can make them fear to break the laws. For instance, if they are proven to disobey the applied rules, it is seemly a good way to punish them by taking their driving licenses forcefully. This measure is likely to alert them to think twice before breaking the laws because if they commit it they cannot drive anymore. This way can indirectly encourage them to obey the rules hence the accidents on the road are likely to be declined. The traffic rules are applicable only for the drivers, but also for the ordinary commuters as well. While an over-bridge or an under pathway is mandatory for crossing the busy roads, many people do not obey this rules. It is not unusual that many careless drivers do not follow the traffic signals and all these violations of traffic rules cause severe accidents and congestion in many cities. Hence, implementing strict punishment and fine can be one effective solution to tackle this issue.
On the other hand, many believe that other measures could be more successful to address this problem, including creating awareness among citizens to drive safely, organising seminars & training programmes about the importance of road safety and modernising the traffic control system. The research carried out by Statistics Center, an organisation at the University of Diponegoro, reveals that citizens in Semarang who have wide knowledge about how to drive safely tend to obey the applied rules if compared to the ones who does not have this knowledge. This makes clear that these measures can be utilised to create a consciousness to be safe riders.
Apart from that, the number of cars and buses on the roads in many cities is much higher and restricting the private car ownership can reduce the number of cars on the roads and thus the number of accidents or casualties. Improving the traffic system with modern equipment and enrolling more trained and professional traffic police could be another great way to tackle this issue.
To conclude, the establishment of punishment strictly is a wise idea but by presenting workshops and training programmes to all citizens, especially drivers of different vehicles, improving the traffic control system are the finest ways to encourage them to increase security on the way.
Industries and businesses are the most concern in many cities as they make the city more congested and pollute the environment in one hand, while creating job opportunities and contribute to the development of the city on the other hand. Many of the enterprises are operated and promoted in bigger cities only. Encouraging them to move to regional areas is a good idea. I have more benefits than drawbacks.
There are several advantages to the industry and should take initiatives to so. The most important aspect is the development of the regional areas. Setting up of enterprises in rural areas will help to develop basic infrastructures transportation, electricity and road in rural areas. In addition, the people of this area will have the golden opportunity of employment and that would enhance the living standard as well. Moreover, the economic activity of the area will increase and that will let the government take further initiatives in order to develop this urban area. The different types of small businesses and industries hotel, lodge, suppliers will emerge and that will support other businesses and add value to the economy of these areas.
Regional offices are often helpful to expand businesses and to reduce the manufacturing and operating costs. Có nhiều công nghiệp lớn nhất sẽ được thực hiện từ này. Again the pressure on the big cities would reduce and that would lessen many serious issues pollutions, traffic jam and waste management.
Despite this, there are several disadvantages of moving businesses and industries to regional areas. One of the most prominent drawbacks is the exploitation of natural resources. The industry will use forest resources, which will cause environmental degradation pollution, climate change and much more. The gradual increase in the population size in such urban areas will increase the crime rate. Finally relocating an industry to a different place involves a great amount of costs and the industry would not want to spend this amount naturally.
All in all, comparing the good look and the bad, I think that the government must encourage the industries and businesses to move to the regional areas where they would operate in better fashion for the overall betterment of economy and environment and population.
It is certainly true that people in rural areas move to cities in order to achieve high standards of living, but indeed life in cities is more challenging and difficult when compared to villages. There are several reasons for this kind of problem and various measures could be taken by government to improve the situation.
Life in the cities has its drawbacks, for instance, the cost of living in cities is higher than in rural areas, especially housing is much more expensive. As a result, homelessness is becoming more common in cities. There are also more serious problem like traffic congestion and some people do not manage work that can lead to people to commit crime. Moreover, there is a lack of sense of community in big cities, people do not even know their neighbors. Life in cities can be stressful and individuals do not have much time for themselves and their families, as a result the gap between family members is on the increase.
To overcome the increasing troublesome life in cities, the government should start some active measures. Firstly, one key to cities work better is good planning. Planners need to transform cities to make them beneficial for all citizens. Cities need green transport and green spaces; they need to be energy efficient and pedestrian friendly, with housing and jobs to attract people to come to live there. Secondly, the authority should make stricter laws to reduce traffic such as allowing ownership of only car per family and increasing the price of the car and petrol. And people would be encouraged to use public transport rather than driving. Finally, the initiatives could solve the housing problem by building high-rise apartment or by expanding cities.
In conclusion, it seems to me that there are various reasons for the problem in cities life that we are facing now and steps need to taken to tackle this problem.
Cities are often seen as places of opportunity, but there are also some major drawbacks of living in a large metropolis. In my opinion, governments could do much more to improve city life for the average inhabitant.
The main problem for anyone who hopes to migrate to a large city is that the cost of living is likely to be much higher than it is in a small town or village. Inhabitants of cities have to pay higher prices for housing, transport, and even food. Another issue is that urban areas tend to suffer from social problems such as high crime and poverty rates in comparison with rural areas. Furthermore, the air quality in cities is often poor, due to pollution from traffic, and the streets and public transport systems are usually overcrowded. As a result, city life can be unhealthy and stressful.
However, there are various steps that governments could take to tackle these problems. Firstly, they could invest money in the building of affordable or social housing to reduce the cost of living. Secondly, politicians have the power to ban vehicles from city centres and promote the use of cleaner public transport, which would help to reduce both air pollution and traffic congestion. In London, for example, the introduction of a congestion charge for drivers has helped to curb the traffic problem. A third option would be to develop provincial towns and rural areas, by moving industry and jobs to those regions, in order to reduce the pressure on major cities.
In conclusion, governments could certainly implement a range of measures to enhance the quality of life for all city residents.
The youth of today are more interested in international celebrities rather than historical figures of their country. I think the main reasons for this trend are the entertaining content and excessive coverage of entertainment-related news, but there are some possible solutions. One reason why young people are more fascinated by well-known pop and movie stars is simply that they are more interesting. In comparison to reading historical information in long narratives of past events and people, watching a hilarious comedy or listening to a beautiful tune is usually more relaxing and gives the youth a much-needed break after long hours at school and work. Furthermore, as a response to the rising demand for engaging content, the media flood their channels with entertainment news, resulting in an increased public awareness of both foreign and domestic celebrities. One way to encourage the young generation to pay more attention to history is that education authorities should improve the way history is taught. The history curriculum, for example, should largely consist of interactive activities such as visiting historic places and discussing historical events after watching related documentaries. In addition, governments could collaborate with the media to publish more engaging history-related content. For instance, the Japanese government has worked with a number of major publishers to produce gripping comics about historical dynasties. This innovative approach has been hugely successfully with these comics becoming very popular among the youth, thereby popularizing historically significant people and their contributions to Japan’s establishment and development. In conclusion, the young generation is more familiar with foreign entertainment stars than important people in the history of their nations mainly because the former are a better source of fun and appear more frequently in the news. However, this situation would improve if schools make history lessons more lively, and governments cooperate with the media in educating the public
Bài viết 1:
The view, a year of traveling after teenagers finish high school, has been became more and more popular in the world, especially among developed countries. It's seem to be useful way for young people preparing for future and thinking about their future life.
Experts say that gap year is a chance to whom want to experience a completely independent life for first time, thinking about if necessary to continue their study or it's better to find a suitable job? For this reason traveling is a good solution both answer their question and enjoy their life. Generally speaking traveling make human a mature person, by improving human knowledge about own and the world that surrounded them. All of these help to recognize your favorites better and help to make right decision in the future. Also during a journey tolerance of human goes up and it good enough to accept your life duties best and bear hard situations.
On the other hand some people argue that such journeys covered huge cost. Since gappers pay their travel cost, they might go back home without any money for rest of life. So, they say going such journey basically is wrong. This view is true somehow. For all I think governments should pay part of costs in order to encourage people to do that, also organize these travels to be cheaper due to decrease disadvantages of it. In my view, if it is possible, this way is the big chance for the majority of gappers to know themselves.
Over all, although gap year has some disadvantages like it's expensive costs, it could be a good solution for whom want to feel a independent life if governments try to plan such trips.
Bài viết 2:
Some youngsters consider a gap year the key to enhancing their career prospects, others think it is a worthless pursuit. I believe that pursuing a gap-year can provide worthwhile experiences to juveniles, laying the seeds of a prosperous professional career. Although a gap-year is an exciting opportunity to undertake a self-development project, it is risky at the same time.
On the one hand, youngsters can gain relevant work experiences, key skills; broadening their view of the world. Working during the defer years can increase invaluable knowledge. Furthermore, experiencing other countries can help gain an appreciation and awareness of global issues, putting people in the lead. Such knowledge is paramount to secure a dream job.
On the other hand, it can cost an awful amount of money to organise and realise. To add to the ordeal, one can get bankrupt. One in ten people face financial ordeals from budget mismanagement according to gap-year tour operators, however, that number is negligible.
Finally, in my opinion, hefty expenses should be the least cause for deterring a gap-year. The return on investment is high, bringing positive drastic changes to the personality of the youngster. Travelling to other countries solidifies young adults with soft, and hard skills; moulding character and individuality. Facing and circumventing adversity in an unfamiliar country sets a solid foundation for solving problems in life. Such experience is worth the expense.
In conclusion, there is definitely an edge some young person can attain contrasting to those who consider gap-years an expensive waste of time. However, improper planning can adversely affect personal finances; accurate gap-year budget plans eliminates the risk of debt and bankruptcy.
Chào bạn, câu trả lời của bạn rất hay, cho mình hỏi bạn tự làm hay chép, nếu chép cho mình xin link của trang nha
REFER NHÉ !!!
Studying has a great effect on our lives. The way we study is important and we have to plan it well to achieve our goals. Many students prefer to study alone but others not. Personally, I prefer to studying with a group for three important reasons.
First, I have a benefit of exchanging experience with other students. As studying in a group give us the chance to get a lot o different ideas and explanations. For example, when I were at high school, I and my group study have to prepare for a chemistry project. So we all worked together, collected all the information and finally we discussed all the materials. That will not happened if I Try to made it alone.
Second, in studying group, we have to work together as I mentioned, and thus we save time as we are dividing the work and every one has to do his part. By this we are going to finish faster. For example, yesterday, my son told me how his group win the contest because they all work together hardly and win the first place. While others prefer to work alone.
Third, studying in a group also gives us experience how to interact with each other. We learn how to listen to other and respect other opinions. This will help us in our work in the future. Nowadays, many work depends on how we deal with others and sometimes we have open discussions. So we will going to work with a large groups and we must know how to deal with this.
In conclusion, I think that by studying in groups we will have a lot of advantages. Not only we will get a variety of ideas but also have a great experience which will help us in future in our careers. So that's why I prefer a group studying.
In the recent days, everyone wishes to pay rent, enjoying the present life rather taking up the burden of paying Equated Monthly Installment (EMI). While there are many advantages influencing people to reside in rented accommodation, there are also drawbacks which are worth considering.
To state upon on the advantages of renting, firstly, people can live very closer to work, schools, hospitals etc., For instance, if there is a transfer of job location, it is very easy to look for another rented house nearer to office. Secondly, you get a chance to live in big apartments and posh houses for short timing and enjoy all the amenities provided without having to think much on investing in buying them. Finally the financial risk is low.
On the contrary, living in a rented house you cannot claim ownership.All the earnings are spent in paying rent leaving a person totally skint when the person is retired. i.e Consider an example of a family staying in a house paying 20k rent whereas they could have invested in buying a flat and pay 20k as monthly EMI. Apart, not all house owners are nice people. Some landlords have stringent rules for the houses rented and collect huge maintenance fees. Moreover, each time while relocating there will be extra cost involved for mail redirection, shifting etc.,
Finally, discussing upon on the ideas of renting, there are equal number of pros and cons on this issue. It depends upon one's own needs and financial circumstances to choose whether to live in a rented house or own house.